| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2 |
| Date: | 2018-03-01 23:31:30 |
| Message-ID: | 797A939A-BA84-46DE-8AF6-7BC79E90A46B@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On March 1, 2018 3:22:44 PM PST, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>On 03/01/2018 11:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2018-02-20 22:23:54 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> So I've decided to revive the old patch, rebase it to current
>master,
>>> and see if we can resolve the issues that killed it in 2016.
>>
>> There seems to be some good discussion in the thread. But the patch
>> arrived just before the last commitfest and certainly isn't a trivial
>> cleanup patch. Therefore I think it should be moved to the next CF?
>>
>
>It isn't a massive invasive patch either, though, so I object to moving
>it to 2018-09 right away.
Why do we have rules around not submitting large stuff to the last cf, if we just not follow through? We're neck deep in patches that are older. And you've already gotten a fair bit of feedback..
Andres
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-01 23:49:20 | Re: [patch] BUG #15005: ANALYZE can make pg_class.reltuples inaccurate. |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-03-01 23:22:44 | Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2 |