| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2 |
| Date: | 2018-03-01 23:22:44 |
| Message-ID: | 5a042840-ec6d-3a17-d886-6d6f1bff9d3a@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/01/2018 11:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-02-20 22:23:54 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> So I've decided to revive the old patch, rebase it to current master,
>> and see if we can resolve the issues that killed it in 2016.
>
> There seems to be some good discussion in the thread. But the patch
> arrived just before the last commitfest and certainly isn't a trivial
> cleanup patch. Therefore I think it should be moved to the next CF?
>
It isn't a massive invasive patch either, though, so I object to moving
it to 2018-09 right away.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-01 23:31:30 | Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2 |
| Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2018-03-01 23:18:20 | Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values |