From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case |
Date: | 2022-02-14 09:37:57 |
Message-ID: | 7925470a-776f-3288-81f6-dca2703dd838@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28/01/2022 12:10, Amul Sul wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:01 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>>
>> After reading this patch and this thread, I have noticed that you are
>> testing the same thing as Heikki here, patch 0001:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52bc9ccd-8591-431b-0086-15d9acf25a3f@iki.fi
>>
>> The patch sent on the other thread has a better description and shape,
>> so perhaps we'd better drop what is posted here in favor of the other
>> version. Thoughts?
>
> Yes, I do agree with you. Thanks for the comparison.
Pushed the test from that other thread now. Thanks!
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amul Sul | 2022-02-14 09:42:18 | Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2022-02-14 09:36:37 | Re: Split xlog.c |