| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |
| Date: | 2025-03-19 18:55:58 |
| Message-ID: | 784527.1742410558@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> Committed that, thanks.
Buildfarm member snakefly doesn't like this too much. Since no other
animals have failed, I guess it must be about local conditions on
that machine, but the report is pretty opaque:
# +++ tap check in src/test/modules/test_extensions +++
# Failed test '$system extension is installed correctly on pg_available_extensions'
# at t/001_extension_control_path.pl line 69.
# got: 'f'
# expected: 't'
# Failed test '$system extension is installed correctly on pg_available_extensions with empty extension_control_path'
# at t/001_extension_control_path.pl line 76.
# got: 'f'
# expected: 't'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 5.
[06:43:53] t/001_extension_control_path.pl ..
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/5 subtests
Looking at the test, it presupposes that "amcheck" must be an
available extension. I do not see anything that guarantees
that that's so, though. It'd fail if contrib hasn't been
installed. Is there a reason to use "amcheck" rather than
something more certainly available, like "plpgsql"?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-03-19 19:21:02 | Re: dblink: Add SCRAM pass-through authentication |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-03-19 18:40:25 | Re: Orphaned users in PG16 and above can only be managed by Superusers |