| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>, Rudolf van der Leeden <vanderleeden(at)logicunited(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres 8.3 archive_command |
| Date: | 2007-11-22 15:39:44 |
| Message-ID: | 7843.1195745984@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 10:34 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
>> On further reflection I think that initdb time is probably sufficient.
>> Do you think that would be a reasonable TODO ?
> I think you'd have to explain why this was needed. It was useful for
> performance once, but not anymore.
Yeah, some demonstration that choosing another size is actually useful
would be a good idea before we go to the trouble of making it runtime
configurable. It's already build-time configurable, and I'm not
convinced that that's not sufficient.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2007-11-22 15:59:09 | Re: Fix pg_dump dependency on postgres.h |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-22 15:37:12 | Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |