From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix pg_dump dependency on postgres.h |
Date: | 2007-11-22 15:59:09 |
Message-ID: | 4745A74D.6040504@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane napsal(a):
> (a) it wasn't "to build at all", it was to allow "inline" to be enabled
> on Sun Studio's compiler, which apparently is too dumb to not generate
> copies of an unreferenced inline function.
I don't think that you have right. inline is just optimizer hint and Sun Studio
performs inline optimization from level 3 (-xO3). In lower level it generates
it as local function. And on other side GCC (3.4.3) performs inconsistent
optimization on -O0 level which is by my opinion also for discussion see
following case:
---------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
static inline int test_1(int a)
{
return a*a;
}
static inline int test_2(int p)
{
return p*p;
}
static int test_3(int p)
{
return p*p;
}
int main()
{
int a = 3;
printf("%i\n", test_1(a));
return 0;
}
bash-3.2$ nm ./a.out | grep test
[58] | 134548680| 15|FUNC |LOCL |0 |13 |test_1
[57] | 134548592| 15|FUNC |LOCL |0 |13 |test_3
---------------------------------
Why test_3 is not removed as unused function, but test_2 is? By my opinion it is
inconsistent. GCC removes test_3 on -O2 level. And why -fkeep-inline-functions
does not work? It seems to me that somebody modify gcc to fix similar problems
as postgreSQL has in the source code.
Zdenek
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-22 16:00:32 | Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-22 15:39:44 | Re: Postgres 8.3 archive_command |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-22 16:24:37 | Re: plpython crash on exception |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-11-22 14:46:21 | Ordered Append WIP patch v1 |