| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility |
| Date: | 2024-06-26 08:48:03 |
| Message-ID: | 7706013aeb104e92594427647857768fe68cd7b8.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 13:55 -0400, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2024, at 7:33 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > I took at a stab at this, using some of your text, but discussing API and ABI separately.
>
> Oh man this is fantastic, thank you! I’d be more than happy to just turn this into a patch.
> But where should it go? Upthread I assumed xfunc.sgml, and still think that’s a likely
> candidate. Perhaps I’ll just start there --- unless someone thinks it should go somewhere
> other than the docs.
Perhaps such information should go somewhere here:
https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2024-06-26 09:00:26 | Re: walsender.c comment with no context is hard to understand |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2024-06-26 08:42:05 | Re: pg_createsubscriber: drop pre-existing subscriptions from the converted node |