From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
Date: | 2013-02-08 18:41:22 |
Message-ID: | 7677.1360348882@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On 2/8/13 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... I don't object to people using their
>> tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making
>> sure that the reviews get archived.
> Gerrit sends me an email every times something happens, so I think this
> is not going to be a problem.
As long as it can be persuaded to mail the text of reviews (not just a
notification), that'd probably be all right.
> What it doesn't support AFAICT is sending emails *in*, but I don't see
> that as a requirement.
Meh. Many of the complaints about the current CF application boil down
to the fact that it doesn't accept email input, so I'm not really
convinced that a different tool that also doesn't accept email input
is going to be a big step forward.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-08 18:43:43 | Re: Time for an autoconf update |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-08 18:31:51 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-02-08 19:23:52 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-08 18:31:51 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |