From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
Date: | 2013-02-08 18:31:51 |
Message-ID: | 51154497.3000709@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 2/8/13 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their
>> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If
>> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes.
>
> I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds
> like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo
> somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all. That would
> make me sad. The list archives are this project's community memory,
> and I have every expectation that they'll still be around and useful
> when Gerrit is forgotten. I don't object to people using their
> tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making
> sure that the reviews get archived.
Gerrit sends me an email every times something happens, so I think this
is not going to be a problem.
What it doesn't support AFAICT is sending emails *in*, but I don't see
that as a requirement.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-08 18:41:22 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-02-08 18:21:39 | Re: Time for an autoconf update |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-08 18:41:22 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-02-08 17:58:37 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |