Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Date: 2013-02-08 18:31:51
Message-ID: 51154497.3000709@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 2/8/13 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their
>> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If
>> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes.
>
> I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds
> like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo
> somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all. That would
> make me sad. The list archives are this project's community memory,
> and I have every expectation that they'll still be around and useful
> when Gerrit is forgotten. I don't object to people using their
> tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making
> sure that the reviews get archived.

Gerrit sends me an email every times something happens, so I think this
is not going to be a problem.

What it doesn't support AFAICT is sending emails *in*, but I don't see
that as a requirement.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-02-08 18:41:22 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-02-08 18:21:39 Re: Time for an autoconf update

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-02-08 18:41:22 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-02-08 17:58:37 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs