Re: Year 2038 Bug?

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Date: 2008-10-13 18:08:20
Message-ID: 766BD962-8A2D-469F-95F9-6274FF20C84C@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 13, 2008, at 11:01, Tom Lane wrote:

> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> Not sure if PostgreSQL uses time_t,
>
> We got rid of that some time ago.

Probably no problem, then. Do dates in PostgreSQL work for their
entire documented ranges on 32bit processors?

Thanks,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-13 18:13:39 Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-13 18:01:19 Re: Year 2038 Bug?