Re: Year 2038 Bug?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Date: 2008-10-13 18:13:39
Message-ID: 18966.1223921619@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> Probably no problem, then. Do dates in PostgreSQL work for their
> entire documented ranges on 32bit processors?

As long as the C compiler supports int64 ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-10-13 18:19:27 Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-10-13 18:08:20 Re: Year 2038 Bug?