Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Sandro Santilli <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mat Arye <mat(at)timescaledb(dot)com>, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Regina Obe <r(at)pcorp(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Date: 2023-06-28 08:29:14
Message-ID: 766065FF-B834-4272-ADE8-559DB06FF9E7@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 31 May 2023, at 21:07, Sandro Santilli <strk(at)kbt(dot)io> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:49:57PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:

>> I'm happy to bring back the control-file switch if there's an
>> agreement about that.
>
> I'm attaching an up-to-date version of the patch with the control-file
> switch back in, so there's an explicit choice by extension developers.

This version fails the extension test since the comment from the .sql file is
missing from test_extensions.out. Can you fix that in a rebase such that the
CFBot can have a green build of this patch?

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-06-28 08:40:22 Re: Detecting use-after-free bugs using gcc's malloc() attribute
Previous Message Richard Guo 2023-06-28 08:27:00 Re: Another incorrect comment for pg_stat_statements