From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New pg_config behavior |
Date: | 2005-10-04 13:52:58 |
Message-ID: | 7647.1128433978@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I have some doubts about the new pg_config behavior of printing "not recorded"
> when an item is not known. I doubt that this will cause automated users of
> this program to behave reasonably in error scenarios. I think a more
> reasonable behavior would be to use a non-zero exit status and possibly print
> a message to stderr and nothing to stdout.
Good point, although in practice that code only gets compiled in builds
with brain-dead Windows tools; I rather doubt that the resulting executable
would ever get used as you foresee. But if you want to change it, OK
with me.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-04 14:06:24 | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-10-04 13:25:24 | Re: New Point Releases Available |