Re: kill -KILL: What happens?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: kill -KILL: What happens?
Date: 2011-01-13 20:37:20
Message-ID: 7601.1294951040@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I strongly believe you're in the minority on that one, for the same
> reasons that I don't think most people would agree with your notion of
> what should be the default shutdown mode. A database that can't
> accept new connections is a liability, not an asset.

Killing active sessions when it's not absolutely necessary is not an
asset.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-13 20:40:11 Re: kill -KILL: What happens?
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-01-13 20:18:36 Re: kill -KILL: What happens?