Re: kill -KILL: What happens?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>,"Florian Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: kill -KILL: What happens?
Date: 2011-01-13 20:18:36
Message-ID: 4D2F09BC02000025000394C1@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> A database that can't accept new connections is a liability, not
> an asset.

+1

I have so far been unable to imagine a use case for the production
databases I use where I would prefer to see backends continue after
postmaster failure.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-13 20:37:20 Re: kill -KILL: What happens?
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2011-01-13 20:18:06 Re: kill -KILL: What happens?