| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | thommy <der(dot)thommy(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5657: wrong entry in sql_features |
| Date: | 2010-09-14 16:34:22 |
| Message-ID: | 7579.1284482062@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 14/09/10 17:08, thommy wrote:
>> -[ RECORD 2 ]----+---------------------------
>> feature_id | B032
>> feature_name | Extended dynamic SQL
>> sub_feature_id | 01
>> sub_feature_name |<describe input statement>
>> is_supported | NO
>> is_verified_by |
>> comments |
> Can you elaborate, what is wrong with the above? What did you expect to
> see instead?
What I see in SQL:99 is
| 3 | B032 | Extended dynamic SQL |
| | | |
| 4 | B032-| <describe input> statement |
01
so I think his point is that the right angle bracket is in the wrong place.
Can't get terribly excited about it ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-14 16:37:36 | Re: BUG #5656: parameter 'client_min_messages' accept values not listed in enumvals |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-09-14 15:29:26 | Re: BUG #5657: wrong entry in sql_features |