| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, thommy <der(dot)thommy(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5657: wrong entry in sql_features |
| Date: | 2010-09-14 18:07:35 |
| Message-ID: | 1284487655.4696.13.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On tis, 2010-09-14 at 12:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > On 14/09/10 17:08, thommy wrote:
> >> -[ RECORD 2 ]----+---------------------------
> >> feature_id | B032
> >> feature_name | Extended dynamic SQL
> >> sub_feature_id | 01
> >> sub_feature_name |<describe input statement>
> >> is_supported | NO
> >> is_verified_by |
> >> comments |
>
> > Can you elaborate, what is wrong with the above? What did you expect to
> > see instead?
>
> What I see in SQL:99 is
>
> | 3 | B032 | Extended dynamic SQL |
> | | | |
> | 4 | B032-| <describe input> statement |
> 01
>
> so I think his point is that the right angle bracket is in the wrong place.
> Can't get terribly excited about it ...
SQL:2008 has <describe input statement>.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-09-14 18:12:11 | Re: BUG #5656: parameter 'client_min_messages' accept values not listed in enumvals |
| Previous Message | Thomas Bahls | 2010-09-14 17:44:16 | Re: BUG #5657: wrong entry in sql_features |