Re: mixed, named notation support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Prentice <prentice(at)cisco(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mixed, named notation support
Date: 2009-08-06 23:10:47
Message-ID: 7550.1249600247@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> writes:
> Here again a patch version with updated documentation. I will stop
> reviewing this patch now and mark this ready for committer, so we have some
> time left to incorporate additional feedback.

I'm starting to look at this now, and my very first reaction was
"what in the world is a leaky list?". I'm not sure I like the
data structure itself, but the terminology is certainly completely
unhelpful. Can't you come up with something better than
"continuous/leaky"?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2009-08-06 23:14:33 Re: Table and Index compression
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-08-06 23:08:27 Array detection in pg_dump