From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Prentice <prentice(at)cisco(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: mixed, named notation support |
Date: | 2009-08-07 10:08:15 |
Message-ID: | 6FC37BAE5BDB7DE986BF26EA@teje |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On Donnerstag, August 06, 2009 19:10:47 -0400 Tom Lane
<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm starting to look at this now, and my very first reaction was
> "what in the world is a leaky list?". I'm not sure I like the
> data structure itself, but the terminology is certainly completely
> unhelpful.
Hrm, i thought i put a comment in there, but it seems i forgot it, sorry. A
leaky list seems to be a list to remember where to fill in DEFAULT argument
values.
Maybe arg_values with ARGS_NAMED_NOTATION and ARGS_POSITIONAL_NOTATION is a
better notion.
--
Thanks
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-08-07 10:29:37 | Re: Table and Index compression |
Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2009-08-07 09:48:33 | Re: ECPG support for struct in INTO list |