| From: | E-BLOKOS <admin(at)e-blokos(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? |
| Date: | 2021-10-26 11:05:52 |
| Message-ID: | 74cc33d7-d113-5dee-5a5b-c62cd21b7bbd@e-blokos.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10/26/2021 2:35 AM, Laura Smith wrote:
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On Tuesday, October 26th, 2021 at 01:18, Benedict Holland <benedict(dot)m(dot)holland(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, ext4 will solve any and all problems without a very deep understanding of file system architecture. In short, i would stick with ext4 unless you have a good reason not to. Maybe there is one. I have done this a long time and never thought twice about which file system should support my servers.
>>
>
> Curious, when it comes to "traditional" filesystems, why ext4 and not xfs ? AFAIK the legacy issues associated with xfs are long gone ?
>
>
>
XFS is indeed for me the most stable and performant for postgresql
today. EXT4 was good too, but less performant.
--
E-BLOKOS
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-10-26 13:17:23 | Re: Determining if a table really changed in a trigger |
| Previous Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2021-10-26 10:34:44 | Re: plpython3 package installation problem |