| From: | Laura Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | postgre <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? |
| Date: | 2021-10-26 09:35:18 |
| Message-ID: | 5Vf342EjVYrCjs8L5uwfDEoktbrVLeRPqFtYXDll9nDDFXUyCde25uCCgqRd3z1BMGXa2vZf38LjtMAzQS2of5JSl9W5pDVJcd6-6xPxzdI=@protonmail.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Tuesday, October 26th, 2021 at 01:18, Benedict Holland <benedict(dot)m(dot)holland(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In my opinion, ext4 will solve any and all problems without a very deep understanding of file system architecture. In short, i would stick with ext4 unless you have a good reason not to. Maybe there is one. I have done this a long time and never thought twice about which file system should support my servers.
>
Curious, when it comes to "traditional" filesystems, why ext4 and not xfs ? AFAIK the legacy issues associated with xfs are long gone ?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2021-10-26 10:34:44 | Re: plpython3 package installation problem |
| Previous Message | Bob Jolliffe | 2021-10-26 09:23:36 | Re: ZFS filesystem - supported ? |