From: | "Johnson, Shaunn" <SJohnson6(at)bcbsm(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: killing process question |
Date: | 2002-09-19 15:55:18 |
Message-ID: | 73309C2FDD95D11192E60008C7B1D5BB04C73F7B@snt452.corp.bcbsm.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
--okay, but the client has since terminated
--it's session (if i understand you correctly).
--is this just something that will just have to
--hang around until i shutdown the database / boot
--the machine?
-X
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:50 AM
To: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in
Cc: 'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] killing process question
"Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> I guess a backend should terminate as if connection is closed. What say?
No.
It will terminate when it tries to read the next query from the client.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-19 15:58:24 | Re: Memory Errors... |
Previous Message | Johnson, Shaunn | 2002-09-19 15:53:04 | keeping a log / debug info |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-09-19 15:58:55 | Re: killing process question |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-19 15:49:39 | Re: killing process question |