Re: killing process question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in
Cc: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: killing process question
Date: 2002-09-19 15:49:39
Message-ID: 26325.1032450579@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> I guess a backend should terminate as if connection is closed. What say?

No.

It will terminate when it tries to read the next query from the client.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Johnson, Shaunn 2002-09-19 15:53:04 keeping a log / debug info
Previous Message phil young 2002-09-19 15:35:01 rpm with locale enabled

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Johnson, Shaunn 2002-09-19 15:55:18 Re: killing process question
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2002-09-19 15:42:23 Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues