From: | Raimon Fernandez <coder(at)montx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, pgsql-general List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ? |
Date: | 2009-12-22 18:56:04 |
Message-ID: | 72F4E3CD-A0E9-4A22-8AF6-0E7C47387C6D@montx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces |
On 22/12/2009, at 18:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> Raimon Fernandez <coder(at)montx(dot)com> writes:
>> But the portal isn't destroyed after a sync ?
>
> Not directly by a Sync, no.
ok,
>> I'm getting a "Portal 'myPortal' doesn't exist "when sending the next Execute ...
>
> End of transaction would destroy portals --- are you holding a
> transaction open for this? It's basically just like a cursor.
no that I'm aware of it ...
I'll investigate it further ...
thanks!
regards,
raimon
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Barnes | 2009-12-22 19:03:27 | Archive command seem to be working. |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-12-22 18:40:56 | Re: stats collector process: WRDSK = WRDSK_CANCEL? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raimon Fernandez | 2009-12-23 09:24:42 | Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-22 17:15:55 | Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ? |