Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ?

From: Raimon Fernandez <coder(at)montx(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, pgsql-general List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ?
Date: 2009-12-22 18:56:04
Message-ID: 72F4E3CD-A0E9-4A22-8AF6-0E7C47387C6D@montx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces


On 22/12/2009, at 18:15, Tom Lane wrote:

> Raimon Fernandez <coder(at)montx(dot)com> writes:
>> But the portal isn't destroyed after a sync ?
>
> Not directly by a Sync, no.

ok,

>> I'm getting a "Portal 'myPortal' doesn't exist "when sending the next Execute ...
>
> End of transaction would destroy portals --- are you holding a
> transaction open for this? It's basically just like a cursor.

no that I'm aware of it ...

I'll investigate it further ...

thanks!

regards,

raimon

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Barnes 2009-12-22 19:03:27 Archive command seem to be working.
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-12-22 18:40:56 Re: stats collector process: WRDSK = WRDSK_CANCEL?

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raimon Fernandez 2009-12-23 09:24:42 Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-22 17:15:55 Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ?