| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Confusing message in log file |
| Date: | 2008-06-30 22:50:21 |
| Message-ID: | 7217.1214866221@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>> May 14 21:38:40 sfphotodb001 postgres[29658]: [20-1] 2008-05-14 21:38:40
>> PDTLOG: parameter "shared_buffers" cannot be changed after server start;
>> configuration file change ignored
>>
>> The message probably should be rephrased to say that this setting
>> (shared_buffers) will not be changed.
> Actually, no one else has been confused by this wording before, and I
> can't think of better wording that doesn't sound redundant.
How about "... after server start; change ignored" ?
Or "attempted change ignored" ?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-06-30 22:54:46 | Re: Confusing message in log file |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-06-30 22:47:33 | Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes |