From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Confusing message in log file |
Date: | 2008-06-30 22:54:46 |
Message-ID: | 200806302254.m5UMskS29741@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> >> May 14 21:38:40 sfphotodb001 postgres[29658]: [20-1] 2008-05-14 21:38:40
> >> PDTLOG: parameter "shared_buffers" cannot be changed after server start;
> >> configuration file change ignored
> >>
> >> The message probably should be rephrased to say that this setting
> >> (shared_buffers) will not be changed.
>
> > Actually, no one else has been confused by this wording before, and I
> > can't think of better wording that doesn't sound redundant.
>
> How about "... after server start; change ignored" ?
> Or "attempted change ignored" ?
Yea, I like "change ignored" rather than mentioning the configuration
file.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-06-30 23:02:04 | Re: Confusing message in log file |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-30 22:50:21 | Re: Confusing message in log file |