Re: R: feature proposal ...

From: Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Paolo Magnoli <pmagnoli(at)systemevolution(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: R: feature proposal ...
Date: 2005-09-22 19:34:30
Message-ID: 72006932-B433-48DE-85E0-9B0FF3C12CA5@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

absolutely - the main advantage of the syntax tweak is that you can
add parameters more easily.

best regards,

hans

On 22 Sep 2005, at 21:25, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:31:42AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
>> writes:
>>
>>> Paolo Magnoli wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can't you just use a view?
>>>>
>>
>>
>>> no because a new is not a heap ...
>>>
>>
>> I think Paolo's idea is much better than munging the syntax of COPY,
>> though. Fixing COPY so that you *could* copy from a view would
>> provide
>> all the desired functionality without any syntactic warts.
>>
>
> While I'm all for COPY from views, I think I'd rather have the
> syntactic
> warts than code warts. ISTM that
>
> CREATE TEMP VIEW some_name AS SELECT * FROM table WHERE ...;
> COPY some_name TO stdout;
>
> is much uglier than
>
> COPY SELECT * FROM table WHERE ... TO stdout;
> --
> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
> Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-09-22 19:37:37 Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-09-22 19:25:53 Re: R: feature proposal ...