Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
Date: 2005-09-22 19:37:37
Message-ID: 20050922193737.GS7630@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:11:50AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 15:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > Is it possible that the Release Notes do not fully explain the
> > > Constraint Exclusion feature? Or is it the consensus that it works but
> > > not quite well enough to make a song and dance about yet?
> >
> > I hardly think that the existing constraint-exclusion code is enough for
> > us to claim we "support table partitioning". There's too much grunt
> > work that the DBA still has to do to set up a partitioning arrangement.
>
> So you think the DBA can do partitioning? Good.
>
> Setting up partitioning in Oracle or SQLServer2005 requires lots of
> syntax and multiple commands. There are fewer commands with PostgreSQL
> and they are ISO/ANSI compliant also.

Actually, IIRC it takes 2 commands; one to initially setup the
partitioning and one to create new partitions as needed. 3 commands if
you count DROP PARTITON.

It's been a while since I looked at what you've done, but I seem to
recall needing to manually maintain rules every time you create a new
partition.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message AgentM 2005-09-22 19:47:00 Re: R: feature proposal ...
Previous Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig 2005-09-22 19:34:30 Re: R: feature proposal ...