Re: PostgreSQL Performance

From: "Gregory S(dot) Williamson" <gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com>
To: "BASEI, Sidnei R(dot)" <basei(at)sreb(dot)com(dot)br>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Performance
Date: 2005-01-11 21:47:08
Message-ID: 71E37EF6B7DCC1499CEA0316A256832801D4BCFF@loki.wc.globexplorer.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Sidnei,

In principle, yes, postgres can do quite well (we use 2 CPU boxes with 2 gigs of RAM for most of our production servers), but a lot would depened on what sort of use your database gets -- all read and bulk updates ? Or lots of updates ? Are the queries complex ? etc., etc. How fast are the disk drives, and how many of them are ?

If you give people a bit more information you'll get more useful answers.

Greg Williamson
DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC

-----Original Message-----
From: BASEI, Sidnei R. [mailto:basei(at)sreb(dot)com(dot)br]
Sent: Tue 1/11/2005 12:48 PM
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc:
Subject: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL Performance
Hi all

Actually I have the Oracle Database. I am searching about others
Databases Soluctions.

I have a server with 2 processors (XEON 2.8) and 2Gb of RAM memory.

The size of my actual Database is 5Gb and the it has 300 simultaneous
access.

The postgreSQL provide a good performance to my application?
How I could search about?
Thank you very much...

[]´s
Sidnei

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tad Marko 2005-01-11 21:49:32 Re: Limiting user privileges
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-01-11 21:44:55 Re: [ADMIN] Assimilation of these "versus" and hardware