From: | "Gregory S(dot) Williamson" <gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "BASEI, Sidnei R(dot)" <basei(at)sreb(dot)com(dot)br>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Performance |
Date: | 2005-01-11 21:47:08 |
Message-ID: | 71E37EF6B7DCC1499CEA0316A256832801D4BCFF@loki.wc.globexplorer.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Sidnei,
In principle, yes, postgres can do quite well (we use 2 CPU boxes with 2 gigs of RAM for most of our production servers), but a lot would depened on what sort of use your database gets -- all read and bulk updates ? Or lots of updates ? Are the queries complex ? etc., etc. How fast are the disk drives, and how many of them are ?
If you give people a bit more information you'll get more useful answers.
Greg Williamson
DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC
-----Original Message-----
From: BASEI, Sidnei R. [mailto:basei(at)sreb(dot)com(dot)br]
Sent: Tue 1/11/2005 12:48 PM
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc:
Subject: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL Performance
Hi all
Actually I have the Oracle Database. I am searching about others
Databases Soluctions.
I have a server with 2 processors (XEON 2.8) and 2Gb of RAM memory.
The size of my actual Database is 5Gb and the it has 300 simultaneous
access.
The postgreSQL provide a good performance to my application?
How I could search about?
Thank you very much...
[]´s
Sidnei
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tad Marko | 2005-01-11 21:49:32 | Re: Limiting user privileges |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-01-11 21:44:55 | Re: [ADMIN] Assimilation of these "versus" and hardware |