| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)tocr(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] Assimilation of these "versus" and hardware |
| Date: | 2005-01-11 21:44:55 |
| Message-ID: | 41E448D7.5030005@tocr.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>Matt,
>
>
>>I had one comment on the pg_autovacuum section. Near the bottom it
>>lists some of it's limitations, and I want to clarify the 1st one: "Does
>>not reset the transaction counter". I assume this is talking about the
>>xid wraparound problem? If so, then that bullet can be removed.
>>pg_autovacuum does check for xid wraparound and perform a database wide
>>vacuum analyze when it's needed.
>>
>>
>
>Keen. That's an 8.0 fix?
>
Nope, been there since before 7.4 was released.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory S. Williamson | 2005-01-11 21:47:08 | Re: PostgreSQL Performance |
| Previous Message | Goulet, Dick | 2005-01-11 21:44:46 | Re: PostgreSQL Performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | amrit | 2005-01-12 03:49:28 | Increasing RAM for more than 4 Gb. using postgresql |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-01-11 20:52:29 | Re: [ADMIN] Assimilation of these "versus" and hardware threads |