Re: Simple SQL too slow

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daviramos Roussenq Fortunato <daviramosrf(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple SQL too slow
Date: 2017-07-01 20:58:30
Message-ID: 7152357d-5cac-20d6-9c08-ea56878c3d03@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello,

On 07/01/2017 10:39 PM, Daviramos Roussenq Fortunato wrote:
> What tests could I do. Rigid Linux disk is much faster than Windows, I
> should get a much better perfomace on this Linux. What test battery do
> you recommend I do?
>

I'm not sure what you mean by "rigid disk" or "test battery", but I
agree with Andreas that clearly there's something wrong at the system
level. It's hard to guess what exactly, but sequential scan on 250MB
table (computed the relpages values) should only take a few seconds on
any decent hardware, and not 3 or 7 minutes.

The first thing I would do is running basic system-level tests, for
example benchmarking storage using fio.

After that, you need to determine what is the bottleneck. Perhaps the
resources are saturated by something else running on the system - other
queries, maybe something else running next to PostgreSQL. Look at top
and iotop while running the queries, and other system tools.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2017-07-01 21:17:02 Re: Simple SQL too slow
Previous Message Daviramos Roussenq Fortunato 2017-07-01 20:39:55 Re: Simple SQL too slow