Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > I still believe it makes sense to have them separated. I did have
> > some data, which has since been destroyed, that suggested there were
> > some system characterization differences for OLTP workloads with
> > PostgreSQL. Let's hope those disks get delivered to Portland soon. :)
>
> Fair enough. It's not that much more code to have another configure
> switch --- will go do that.
>
> If we are allowing blocksize and relation seg size to have configure
> switches, seems that symmetry would demand that XLOG_SEG_SIZE be
> configurable as well. Thoughts?

I don't have a feel for this one, but when we get the disks set up we
can certainly test to see what effects it has. :)

Regards,
Mark