Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Hell, Robert" <Robert(dot)Hell(at)fabasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction
Date: 2008-05-02 17:52:10
Message-ID: 1209750730.4264.177.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 12:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> I see this as being basically another cost parameter, and as such
> I don't think it needs more documentation than any of those have.
> (Now admittedly you could argue that they could all use a ton more
> documentation than they now have, but it's not reasonable to insist
> on just this one meeting a different standard.)

OK, if that's the view then the patch is ready for commit, AFAICS.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dickson dos Santos Guedes 2008-05-02 18:07:08 Re: Patch to add objetct size on "\d+" verbose output
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-05-02 17:41:48 Re: GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2008-05-02 18:34:18 Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-05-02 17:41:48 Re: GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction