Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, ma lz <ma100(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX
Date: 2025-03-26 00:56:29
Message-ID: 70BA294B-5A33-4F47-A637-8011C1F279CB@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


> If I get the difference right, semantically would apply to concepts
> related to linguistics, but that's not what we have here, so you are
> using a more general term.

FWIW, the pg_stat_statements docs in a few places refer to
queries that may look different but have the same meaning
as “semantically equivalent”, this is why I used the same
terminology here. But, I have no issue with the simplified
rewrite either.

The patch LGTM as well.

Regards,

Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phillip Diffley 2025-03-26 03:56:38 Re: Replication slot WAL reservation
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-03-26 00:34:02 Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-03-26 01:04:13 Re: Query ID Calculation Fix for DISTINCT / ORDER BY and LIMIT / OFFSET
Previous Message Rafael Thofehrn Castro 2025-03-26 00:52:03 Re: Proposal: Progressive explain