From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jacob Rief" <jacob(dot)rief(at)gmx(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SPI-header-files safe for C++-compiler |
Date: | 2007-07-03 14:09:16 |
Message-ID: | 7096.1183471756@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Jacob Rief" <jacob(dot)rief(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
> Just for curiosity, I would like to ask something.
> libpqxx is based on libpq, and thus includes headers-files from libpq.
> These header-files are C++-safe, otherwise libpqxx would'nt compile.
Well, if they are, it's only by chance, because there isn't much of
anything verifying that they are safe :-(.
> Whats the point in having a two-class-society of headers files, some
> of which are compatible for C++-compilers (the client-side), and some
> which aren't (the server-side).
It makes sense for libpq to be able to execute within a C++ application.
As was already debated, it's not nearly as clear that it makes sense to
try to use C++ for backend modules.
In any case, you are not helping here. I asked for a technical solution
to a specific problem, and you are giving me political arguments.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-03 16:43:58 | Re: pgstat_drop_relation bugfix |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-03 14:02:57 | Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, final patch |