From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() |
Date: | 2017-05-10 20:59:51 |
Message-ID: | 70773831-04c8-d50e-d6b1-7ef9acd13176@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/05/17 21:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> In terms of the alternatives I listed previously, it seems like
>>> nobody liked alternatives #3, #4, or #5, leaving us with #1 (do
>>> nothing) or #2 (apply this patch). By my count, Peter is the
>>> only one in favor of doing nothing, and is outvoted. I'll push
>>> the patch later today if I don't hear additional comments.
>
>> For the record, I also voted for doing nothing.
>
> Hm, well, anybody else want to vote?
>
I am for standardizing (although I don't have preference of location vs
lsn).
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2017-05-10 21:02:07 | Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-05-10 20:58:29 | Re: Function to move the position of a replication slot |