| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() |
| Date: | 2017-05-10 19:22:05 |
| Message-ID: | 4513.1494444125@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> In terms of the alternatives I listed previously, it seems like
>> nobody liked alternatives #3, #4, or #5, leaving us with #1 (do
>> nothing) or #2 (apply this patch). By my count, Peter is the
>> only one in favor of doing nothing, and is outvoted. I'll push
>> the patch later today if I don't hear additional comments.
> For the record, I also voted for doing nothing.
Hm, well, anybody else want to vote?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-10 19:52:23 | Re: Issues with replication slots(which created manually) against logical replication |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-10 18:10:56 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |