From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Raghavendra Rao J S V <raghavendrajsv(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is it ok to run vacuum full verbose command for live database for the tables which has more dead tuples? |
Date: | 2018-07-18 13:18:52 |
Message-ID: | 6ff5e1a7-32d3-0e84-93f5-20630b2ccdca@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 07/18/2018 02:13 AM, Raghavendra Rao J S V wrote:
> We have thousands of tables. But out of those tables, around 20 to 40
> tables are always busy due to that those tables are bloating.
Define bloating?
>
> In order to avoid this we are running a shell script which performs
> vacuum full on the tables which has more than ten thousand dead tuples.
Out of how many live tuples?
> While running this we are stopping all application processors and
> running vacuum full on the tables which has more dead tuples.
>
> 1. Is it ok to run *vacuum full verbose* command for live database for
> the tables which has more dead tuples(greater than)?
> 2. Does it cause any *adverse *effect?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-vacuum.html
"FULL
Selects “full” vacuum, which can reclaim more space, but takes much
longer and exclusively locks the table. This method also requires extra
disk space, since it writes a new copy of the table and doesn't release
the old copy until the operation is complete. Usually this should only
be used when a significant amount of space needs to be reclaimed from
within the table.
"
>
>
> Please clarify me. Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Raghavendra Rao J S V
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2018-07-18 13:57:47 | Re: A bit confused about "pgsql_tmp" vs "temp tablespace" |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-07-18 13:06:08 | Re: A bit confused about "pgsql_tmp" vs "temp tablespace" |