From: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Function to get invalidation cause of a replication slot. |
Date: | 2023-12-20 07:16:09 |
Message-ID: | 6c6801e8-a4f5-40b6-b7b0-666dec609cd1@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 12/20/23 7:01 AM, shveta malik wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> Attached is a patch which attempts to implement a new system function
> pg_get_slot_invalidation_cause('slot_name') to get invalidation cause
> of a replication slot.
Thanks! +1 for the idea to display this information through an SQL API.
I wonder if we could add a new field to pg_replication_slots instead
of creating a new function.
> One of the use case scenarios for this function is another ongoing
> thread "Synchronizing slots from primary to standby" at [1]. This
> function is needed there to replicate invalidation-cause of a logical
> replication slot from the primary server to the hot standby. But this
> is an independent requirement in itself and thus makes sense to have
> it implemented separately.
Agree.
My thoughts about it:
1 ===
"Currently, users do not have a way to know the invalidation cause"
I'm not sure about it, I think one could see the reasons in the log file.
2 ===
"This function returns NULL if the replication slot is not found"
Why not returning an error instead? (like pg_drop_replication_slot() does for example)
FWIW, we'd not need to cover this case if the description would be added to pg_replication_slots.
3 ===
+ <para>
+ <literal>3</literal> = wal_level insufficient for the slot
+ </para>
wal_level insufficient on the primary maybe?
4 ===
+ * Returns ReplicationSlotInvalidationCause enum value for valid slot_name;
I think it would be more user friendly to return a description instead of an enum value.
5 ===
doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/backend/replication/slotfuncs.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat | 4 ++++
Worth to add some coverage in 019_replslot_limit.pl and 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl?
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-12-20 07:31:01 | Re: Remove MSVC scripts from the tree |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2023-12-20 06:51:05 | Re: Add new for_each macros for iterating over a List that do not require ListCell pointer |