Re: SQL:2011 application time

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date: 2025-03-10 10:56:00
Message-ID: 6ac43c8e-5595-40d9-a039-ede12e7487e1@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26.02.25 06:15, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> > ON DELETE RESTRICT must be specified when PERIOD BUSINESS_TIME is
> also specified.
>
> Here are some patches removing support for RESTRICT

I have committed this.

I think this is about as much as we can hope to get done from this patch
series for PG18. I don't think the subsequent patches are ready enough.
As an example, the FOR PORTION OF still has the problem I mentioned at
<https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d4c5de4d-ff2d-4ef6-b7a2-1787dfa6427b%40eisentraut.org>,
and a few similar structural problems. Also, I see that you have
recently changed some things to make use of SPI, which seems
problematic. This needs much further analysis.

My suggestions is to close the commitfest entry as "committed" and start
new threads and new entries for the subsequent features.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-03-10 10:59:50 RE: Selectively invalidate caches in pgoutput module
Previous Message Bykov Ivan 2025-03-10 10:17:45 RE: Query ID Calculation Fix for DISTINCT / ORDER BY and LIMIT / OFFSET