| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The order of columns about WAL activity in pg_stat_statements |
| Date: | 2020-05-13 16:12:21 |
| Message-ID: | 6a2cca46-d3c0-265a-9c63-7814e4b3549b@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 2020/05/14 0:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
>> In pg_stat_statements docs, the columns about WAL activity are put
>> in the table in the order of wal_bytes, wal_records and wal_fpi. But
>> in the definition of pg_stat_statements view, wal_bytes is put last.
>> So I think that it's better to reorder those columns in a consistent
>> with the view definition. Patch attached. Thought?
>
> I already fixed this in my pending patch to restructure the catalog
> docs [1].
Sounds nice. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2020-05-13 19:19:08 | Re: dot dot dot dot |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-13 15:41:41 | Re: The order of columns about WAL activity in pg_stat_statements |