Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
> In pg_stat_statements docs, the columns about WAL activity are put
> in the table in the order of wal_bytes, wal_records and wal_fpi. But
> in the definition of pg_stat_statements view, wal_bytes is put last.
> So I think that it's better to reorder those columns in a consistent
> with the view definition. Patch attached. Thought?
I already fixed this in my pending patch to restructure the catalog
docs [1].
regards, tom lane
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14810.1589128043%40sss.pgh.pa.us