Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: 2024-07-15 21:42:05
Message-ID: 6CB2730B-D77A-4B81-B5B0-B49DA2AC4D24@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 14 Jul 2024, at 14:03, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 12.07.24 21:42, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 11 Jul 2024, at 23:22, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>>> The 0001 patch removes the functions pgtls_init_library() and pgtls_init() but keeps the declarations in libpq-int.h. This should be fixed.
>> Ah, nice catch. Done in the attached rebase.
>
> This patch version looks good to me.

Thanks for review, I will go ahead with this once back from vacation at the
tail end of July when I can properly handle the BF.

> Small comments on the commit message of 0002: Typo "checkig". Also, maybe the commit message title can be qualified a little, since we're not really doing "Remove pg_strong_random initialization." but something like "Remove unnecessary ..."?

Good points, will address before pushing.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-07-15 21:58:16 Re: Upgrade Debian CI images to Bookworm
Previous Message Andres Freund 2024-07-15 21:35:14 Re: Upgrade Debian CI images to Bookworm