Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: 2024-07-14 12:03:35
Message-ID: 08fe8eae-887c-42de-85c5-e4cead1b36cb@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12.07.24 21:42, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 11 Jul 2024, at 23:22, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> The 0001 patch removes the functions pgtls_init_library() and pgtls_init() but keeps the declarations in libpq-int.h. This should be fixed.
>
> Ah, nice catch. Done in the attached rebase.

This patch version looks good to me.

Small comments on the commit message of 0002: Typo "checkig". Also,
maybe the commit message title can be qualified a little, since we're
not really doing "Remove pg_strong_random initialization." but something
like "Remove unnecessary ..."?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-07-14 14:47:50 Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-07-13 22:00:32 Re: tests fail on windows with default git settings