| From: | "Philippe Lang" <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Arnaud Lesauvage" <thewild(at)free(dot)fr>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGSQL 7.4 -> 8.1 migration & performance problem |
| Date: | 2006-06-01 13:32:06 |
| Message-ID: | 6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D0D5A@poweredge.attiksystem.ch |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I made some tests, with and without Hyperthreading: with hyperthreading, on
a dual-processor, top mentions a 25% load, and without, 50%, but computing
time is exactly the same.
Philippe
-----Message d'origine-----
De : pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] De la part de Arnaud Lesauvage
Envoyé : mercredi, 31. mai 2006 16:20
À : pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Objet : Re: [GENERAL] PGSQL 7.4 -> 8.1 migration & performance problem
Philippe Lang a écrit :
> Hardware is much more powerful: intel server motherboard, dual-xeon
> 3GHz, SCSI disks (raid 1), 4GB RAM.
Do you need the hyperthreading ?
Depending on your case, you might have better results with 2x3GHz thant
4x1.5GHz.
--
Arnaud
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jimbo1 | 2006-06-01 13:34:39 | Java Triggers |
| Previous Message | Antonios Katsikadamos | 2006-06-01 13:28:03 | postgres in windows |