Re: New regression test time

From: Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New regression test time
Date: 2013-07-01 12:45:48
Message-ID: 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C38421BBF06@szxeml558-mbs.china.huawei.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday, July 01, 2013 8:37 AM Josh Berkus wrote:
On 06/30/2013 12:33 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
>
> On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>>> If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But
>>>> we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to
>>>> split our tests either.
>
>>> I have done a POC. See:
>
>>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1170
>
>> I think it is better to submit for next commit fest which is at below link:
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=19

> I would argue for doing this in this CF, just so that we can have the
> benefit of the extra tests for the next 3 months, and so that Andrew can
> work on the buildfarm additions.

My mail was just a suggestion, as in general after start of CF all new patch submissions for review
are done in next CF.
However as for this particular patch, there are quite a few other dependent patches, so it will be good
if this patch gets committed in this CF only.
Also as a CFM, you are better person to decide about it.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2013-07-01 12:48:03 Re: Review: Display number of changed rows since last analyze
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-07-01 12:35:08 Re: LDAP: bugfix and deprecated OpenLDAP API