| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New regression test time |
| Date: | 2013-07-01 03:07:29 |
| Message-ID: | 51D0F271.6030405@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/30/2013 12:33 AM, Amit kapila wrote:
>
> On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But
>>> we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to
>>> split our tests either.
>
>> I have done a POC. See:
>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1170
>
> I think it is better to submit for next commit fest which is at below link:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=19
I would argue for doing this in this CF, just so that we can have the
benefit of the extra tests for the next 3 months, and so that Andrew can
work on the buildfarm additions.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ian link | 2013-07-01 03:54:51 | Re: Support for RANGE ... PRECEDING windows in OVER |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-07-01 02:58:33 | Re: Eliminating PD_ALL_VISIBLE, take 2 |