From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Giving more detail in pg_upgrade errormessage |
Date: | 2023-07-19 20:26:02 |
Message-ID: | 6C044880-4478-4B7B-81BE-53EA81EDB198@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 18 Jul 2023, at 18:04, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> Looking at the upgrade question in [0] made me realize that we discard
>> potentially useful information for troubleshooting. When we check if the
>> cluster is properly shut down we might as well include the status from
>> pg_controldata in the errormessage as per the trivial (but yet untested)
>> proposed diff.
>
>> Is there a reason not to be verbose here as users might copy/paste this output
>> when asking for help?
>
> Agreed, but I think you need to chomp the string's trailing newline,
> or it'll look ugly. You might as well do that further up and remove
> the newlines from the comparison strings, too.
Yeah, the previous diff was mostly a sketch. The attached strips newline and
makes the comparisons a bit neater in the process due to that. Will apply this
trivial but seemingly useful change unless objected to.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-pg_upgrade-include-additional-detail-in-cluster-c.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-07-19 20:44:15 | Re: Extracting cross-version-upgrade knowledge from buildfarm client |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-07-19 19:38:12 | Re: Adding argument names to aggregate functions |