Re: Majordomo drops multi-line Subject:

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Majordomo drops multi-line Subject:
Date: 2006-09-07 13:24:34
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35661@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> >>> ever noticed/commented about it ... ya, you are the only one
> >>> complaining about it :)
> >> Honestly, it may be time we start looking at mailman.
> >
> > Please don't, unless Majordomo is really broken and unfixed (i.e.
> > there isn't a newer version with the bug fixed). What version
> are we running?
>
> From what I can tell Majordomo isn't even supported any longer.
> Secondly we get some better management (not great but better)
> interfaces with mailman.

Seriously, I think that's the first time anybody said anything good
about the mailman interfaces.... Just the stuff I have to do for the
pgFoundry lists (of which I have only *two*) is just so much pain. (who
came up with such a brilliant thing as
different-password-for-everything-you-do? It's just god-awful if you
have more than one list..)

If we're changing anyway, I think we should seriously consider Sympa,
IMHO. For one thing, it can store it's Config and userlists and stuf in
a PostgreSQL database, so if you're not happy with the interface, it's
fairly trivial to whack something else up. Or if you need to do batch
changes or something... I'm not advocating a change though - I'll stand
neutral on that - but *if* we're going to change...

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-09-07 13:25:35 Re: Majordomo drops multi-line Subject:
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-09-07 13:20:02 Re: Majordomo drops multi-line Subject: