Re: Majordomo drops multi-line Subject:

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Majordomo drops multi-line Subject:
Date: 2006-09-07 13:15:15
Message-ID: 45001B63.5030803@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>> On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> In any case I don't see any reason to let the broken software continue
>>>> to be broken. Surely there must be an updated version which corrects
>>>> this bug? A patch at least? I mean, I can't be the only one
>>>> complaining about it.
>>> Based on this thread, and the fact that you are the first to have ever
>>> noticed/commented about it ... ya, you are the only one complaining
>>> about it :)
>> Honestly, it may be time we start looking at mailman.
>
> Please don't, unless Majordomo is really broken and unfixed (i.e. there
> isn't a newer version with the bug fixed). What version are we running?

From what I can tell Majordomo isn't even supported any longer.
Secondly we get some better management (not great but better) interfaces
with mailman.

Mailman is a supported, large, active, FOSS community project that is
battle tested in the current field much more so then Majordomo. Holding
on with a dying breaths to old software is silly.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-09-07 13:18:50 Re: Replace NULL values
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2006-09-07 13:06:51 Re: Problems with sequences